Should I use Nightly or Stable?
Constant changes are always made on the latest nightly builds, so performance and compatibility is much higher compared to the latest stable release which is updated several times a year only. If you encounter any issues then we recommend rolling back to the latest stable release.
Binaries
| System |
Type |
Version |
Link |
Notes |
| Windows |
Installer |
stable |
link |
select "Latest Stable" then the installer |
| Windows |
Portable |
stable |
link |
select "Latest Stable" then portable |
| Windows |
Portable |
dev |
link |
select "Latest Nightly" then the Windows version |
| Linux |
Appimage |
dev |
link |
select "Latest Nightly" then the Linux Appimage |
| Linux |
Flatpak |
dev |
link |
select "Latest Nightly" then the Linux Flatpak |
| MacOS |
App |
dev |
link |
select "Latest Nightly" then the MacOS version |
Package Managers
Note: The packages here are not maintained officially by the pcsx2 team. Any bugs or issues using the package need to be submitted through their respective package maintainers.
| System |
Manager |
Command |
Version |
More Info |
| Windows |
chocolatey |
choco install pcsx2 |
stable |
link |
| Ubuntu |
apt |
apt install pcsx2 |
stable |
link |
| Ubuntu |
apt (via ppa) |
apt install pcsx2-unstable |
dev |
link |
| Arch |
pacman |
pacman -S pcsx2 |
dev |
link |
| Arch |
yay (via AUR) |
yay -S pcsx2-git |
dev |
link |
| Debian |
apt |
apt install pcsx2 |
stable |
|
| Fedora |
dnf (via rpmfusion) |
sudo dnf install pcsx2 |
stable |
link |
| OpenSUSE |
zypper |
zypper in pcsx2 |
stable |
link |
See Also: Building on Linux